Відео

Very blessed to have found this channel

That teaching by Richard Jordan of Christ giving up His attributes is a heresy.

….yes, this is what I believe.

Jude 7 is correct in that the fall occurred by fornication.

Thank you

I heard Daryl on a conference series in 1996 called ' faith, hope and charity' and i knew straight away he had so much substance in his ministry.i wish i could get more messages by him .Hes been promoted to glory and if there are two preachers of grace id like to meet up there, they are Daryl and the late Keith blades.

Thank you

Proof that no man is our savior. Only YHWH as Jude 1:25 in the kjv says. It says nothing about Jesus. As does Isaiah 43:11. "I even i am YHWH besides ME there is NO SAVIOR". There is NO OTHER Isaiah 45:5-7. The church was led into great apostasy because of blind guides, edited texts, mistranslations, and blantant lies.

Also, in John 8:44, Jesus tells the Jews that Satan is the father of lies and was a murderer from the BEGINNING… so, Adam and Eve probably were not in the Garden too long before they fell…

Who were the Gospels written to?

This is excellent preaching. Thank you for this video all these years later!

Assumptions.

*JONAH = ISRAEL* *GOURD = LAW OF MOSES* *WORM = JESUS CHRIST* *NINEVEH = GENTILES (WHOLE WORLD)* *Israel* refused to take the *Law of Moses* to the *whole world* for salvation; choosing, rather, to bask in being GOD'S chosen people. *JESUS CHRIST* came and took away the *Law of Moses;* nailing it to HIS cross. Thus allowing salvation to go to the *Gentiles.* Col 2 :14. *Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;*

Is it angels or old Testament Saints or both?

Amen

Thank you for making this available. Most wonderful teaching, most wonderful understanding for those who will trust God's Word. We thank the the Lord for R/D grace preachers who help us to live for Christ in the right program! PTL.

Amen

Amen

so intricate

Amen

If God is Love ... (read book 1John kjv) 1 John 4:16 KJV And we have known and believed the love that God hath to us. God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him. Now .. go read the love chapter in Corinthians... And measure all that Christ is and did .... He’s the Word ... He’s also LOVE .. life ... light... etc etc ... and do we live in Him and Him in us ... then love lives in us ... we live in love .... our calling to say .. we live in truth life and spirit ...and love.. I hope people can grasp that ...

Amen

Amen

Really good thanks!

So young!

Richard Jordan is a wonderful ambassador for the Lord

We absolutely love you and love your teachings THANK YOU Brother!

The subject of Cain and brother Tom’s thoughts along with other things considered I think lean much heavier to the verse one situation of a creation before the Adam and garden creation … … the heaven ..and the earth .. and there was darkness …etc …

❤❤

Love this message!! 💕🙏🏼

Every time my soul recognizes this again and again, I laugh with joy! Thank you so much for sharing this and I’m going to share it too. ❤️🙏🏼☺️

Im running into this can we talk pastor.

right on point

Who was the first member of the Body of Christ? When did it happen? Paul on the road to Damascus.

Thanks for doing this video as it's still needed today 02-29-2024 ;-) Praising God for your work and your books as well. Thanks Tom ;-)

Paul was talking to unmarried or widows. Unmarried meaning never been married. Virgins

❤ great Teacher

This is an excellent Bible study!!

PRAISE THE LORD! Thank you for your faithfulness to our Lord's words!!!

Amen

You people need to stop worrying about the gap in your holy book and worry about the gap between your ears.

Nowadays they all run with the religion of money. So true. The speak it HERESY.

Way of Cain is religion? I thought it meant the way of evil, because muderers are evil.

What you are teaching is exactly what Paul and Peter warned would happen if we entertained Jewish myths and fables. 1 Timothy 1:4, 4:7, 2 Timothy 4:4, Titus 1:4, 2 Peter1:16-21, 2:1-2. The doctrine of angels (fallen) having marriages with women is nothing more than speculation derived from the Book of Enoch, and it has no Biblical support whatsoever, none. Think about it, this doctrine mocks the sovereignty of God and is a direct attack on the Deity of Christ. It was the angel Gabreil that visited Mary and told her she would conceive. There is nothing in the context of Genesis 4 and 5 that even hints toward the idea of angels marrying women. We don't even know if angels are males or if they can distinguish between male and female humans. Paul did say that women were to wear a covering because the angels. That's a strange thing to say unless angels can't tell a difference, then it makes total sense. There is nothing in the Law regarding men or women having sexual relationships with spiritual beings. If we ignore the context of chapters 4-5 (lineages of Cain and Seth) and interject angels into the story we are misusing the Bible. One of these doctrines is wrong, one is a flat out lie, one is the truth. From Genesis 6 to 2 Corinthians 6:14 we are taught over and over that believers should NEVER marry unbelievers and the Bible tells us the explicit consequences of disobeying that command. Here are just a few verses that support this. Genesis 24:40, Exodus 34:16, Deuteronomy 7:3-6, Joshua 23:12-13, 1 Kings 11:1-9, Ezra 9:2, Nehemiah 10:30, 13:25-27, Malachi 2:11. In the book of Nehemiah, the men of Israel were literally terrified that the Lord was about to completely destroy them because they married pagan women. We know from Scripture that Cain's family was banished to wander the face of the earth but there is clear evidence that the line of Cain and the line of Seth began to intermarry. Both lineages shared the same names for their sons. There were two Enoch's, two Lamech's, and if you're using the Septuagint there were two Mathusala's. What are the odds of godly men and women using the same names as the ungodly men and women unless they began to dwell together or become family? The Bible teaches us that the sons of God are of the lineage that Jesus came through and it is verified in Luke 3. All of these men were born in the image of Adam who was created in the image of God. Jesus said Cain was of that wicked one the Devil. When Cain was born Eve said I have gotten a man from the Lord. When Seth was born, he was called a son in the image of his father. The phrase sons of God in Genesis 6 refer to the sons from Adam to Noah. It was at the birth of Seth that men began to call upon the name of the Lord or some translations say they were called by the name of the Lord. Preachers say that the sons of God in Genesis 6 had to be angels because Job 1:6, 2:1, and 38:7 refer to angels, but the phrase sons of God was not used in the book of Job until the Masoretic Hebrew Text was written. In the Septuagint it simply said angels of God and Job 38:7 has an entirely different meaning if you read it from the Septuagint. Job 38:7 (Sept.) When the stars were made, all my angels praised me with a loud voice. The Masoretic text came one thousand years after the time of Jesus and after the New Testament. The fact that the book of Job did not call angels sons of God should be noted but also Deuteronomy 32:8 and 43 should be considered as well. Deuteronomy 32:8 (Sept.) When the Most High divided the nations, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the nation's according to the number of the angels of God. 32:43 Rejoice, ye heavens, with him, and let all the angels of God worship him; rejoice ye Gentiles, with his people, and let all the sons of God strengthen themselves in him; for he will avenge the blood of his sons, and he will render vengeance, and recompense justice to his enemies, and will reward them that hate him; and the Lord shall purge the land of his people. Which text is the more accurate one, the Septuagint whose translators would have had no bias against Jesus because it was translated before His birth, or would it be the Masoretic Text written by Jewish Scribes who rejected Jesus as the Messiah. Are the Sons of God believers? Genesis 6:2,4 Exodus 4:22-23, Deuteronomy 14:1, Isaiah 49:17, Hosea 1:10, Matthew 5:9, John 1:12, Romans 8:14, 16, 9:26, Galatians 3:26 1 John 3:1 all agree together that they were men and not angels? We don't know what the older Hebrew manuscripts written before the Septuagint said regarding the scriptures in Job 1, 2, and 38 because they don't exist anymore but if they did call angels sons of God what do we do with Hebrews 1:1-14 because these verses clearly say that God has never called an angel his son. Kind of a strange thing to say unless Hebrews was written after the Book of Enoch, but I don't know this. Jesus said angels never marry or are given in marriage. Was He referring to only heavenly angels as some dare to suggest? Highly doubtful. Could God really be that confused? Were the daughters of men referring to unbelieving women? If not, who were the daughters of the land in Gen 27:46, or the daughters of the uncircumcised in 2 Samuel 1:20, or the daughters of a strange god, Ezra 10:2, Malachi 2:11? Did these titles just mean they were human women, or did it mean they were pagan unbelieving women who would destroy a believing man's relationship with God. The Lord did not destroy the world because of fallen angels or the Nephilim who were nothing more than men with human fathers, He destroyed the world because of the wickedness and violence that began with Cain and was passed down through his daughters turning away the hearts of the men who called on the name of the Lord. Out of all the millions possibly billions of people on the earth up to the time before the flood only twenty-seven people were named in the Bible, three of them amazingly were women from the line of Cain. Lamech's two wives Adah and Zillah, and Zillah's daughter Naamah. The name Adah in Hebrew means beautiful, adorned, ornament. This name was associated with women who wore jewelry and painted their eyes to look more attractive. This name also referred to the apostasy of Israel or to those who would not obey God. 2 Kings 9:39, Jeremiah 4:30, Ezekeil 23:40 confirm this. King Saul (2 Samuel 1:24) had the daughters of Israel adorn themselves with ornaments of gold (Adah). Esau like Lamech took two wives, one was named Adah. Naamah's name means beautiful or pleasant to look at. The sons of God saw the daughters of men and they were beautiful to look at. Jesus said before He comes back that the days would once again be like the days of Noah. I believe we are seeing this play out before our eyes but there's one problem, where is the Nephilim? Or were the giants simply tyrants or bullies, men with fame and greatness? If that is the case think of all the movie stars that are worshipped today. Think of all the professional athletes that are worshipped. Maybe these are the giants of our day, the Nimrods and Goliaths? I believe we will all soon find out. God Bless

At around 4O mins the context you speak about Priscilla and Aqilla. The church was in their home you mentioned. So if Pricilla was to remain silent and ask her husband at home when she was at home how does this work? Regarding the teaching of Apollos by Pricilla Acts18:He (Apollos)began to speak boldly in the synagogue. Priscilla and Aquila heard him. So they invited him to their home. There they gave him a better understanding of the way of God. I also need chapter and verse that tells us that the daughters of the priest did not prohesy at the temple . I cant find a scripture that says that they did not doesn't say where they did it. Act 21 verse 9 tells us that the prohesied . That's all the detail the Holy Spirit gives.

false teaching....the one who marries a divorced woman, commits adultery.....

Amazing

Why didn’t Adam stop Eve because scripture says Adam was standing next to her when she handed the forbidden fruit to him and he ate.

30:28...and they'll try to kill the priest. 😂😂😂

At 20:33 the word “Chief” is “protos” in Greek. We get the word “prototype” from this. He then explains the meaning of prototype in the following verses. He is the “new pattern” that has been hidden in God, hidden from the prophets, hidden since the beginning of time for the uncircumcision.